April 23, 2025

Content Ignite's Opinion on Google Cookie Update

Published By
Alex Newberry
Time
Reading Time
4min
Chat
Chat

Google’s recent decision to abandon its plan to phase out third-party cookies in Chrome marks a significant shift in the company’s approach to online privacy and advertising. In fact, it is a complete U-turn on their position in recent years.

Initially, the Privacy Sandbox initiative aimed to enhance user privacy while supporting the digital advertising ecosystem. However, facing regulatory scrutiny and industry pushback, Google has very recently opted to maintain the current third-party cookie system, allowing users to manage their settings through Chrome’s existing privacy tools.

This move has drawn criticism from privacy advocates. The Center for Democracy and Technology expressed disappointment, stating that Google’s reversal undermines trust and stalls progress toward a more private web. They argue that relying on user choice without default protections places an undue burden on individuals to manage complex privacy settings.

Regulatory bodies have also voiced concerns. The UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) and Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) are reviewing Google’s new approach, emphasising the need to ensure that changes do not harm competition or consumer privacy.

The question this raises for the majority of publishers who may be at the beginning of their journey to make their users more addressable, is whether they should slow down or even scrap this work altogether.

This, in our opinion, would be a massive mistake. The industry estimates that roughly 30-40% of internet users are currently unaddressable, whether that’s from cookie depreciation in other browsers (see Firefox and Safari as two of those), or decisions made by regulators or users themselves.

ID and addressability businesses have put a lot of time, budget and effort into making these users addressable for advertisers and have in fact in many cases improved latency for publishers as well as reducing data leakage by moving away from third-party cookie data to buy against and measure performance.

In summary, Google’s decision to retain third-party cookies in Chrome represents a retreat from its earlier privacy commitments. While the company cites the need to balance privacy with industry needs, critics argue that this move prioritises business interests over user privacy and may hinder the development of more privacy-respecting technologies.

Content Ignite remains focused and dedicated to making the largest possible amount of our publishers’ audience addressable to enable publishers to maximise their revenue. This means continuing to work with ID and addressability partners to enable buyers to reach their desired audience wherever they are on the open internet.

Latest Articles

Latest Articles By Content Ignite

Boosting Publisher Revenue: The Role of Demand Path Optimisation (DPO) and Split Testing

As no clear path or definitive solutions have emerged, it is vital that publishers explore new areas, test new partners and experiment with new technologies to maintain their revenue streams.

View Article

DPO vs SPO - What’s the difference?

Demand Path Optimisation (DPO) and Supply Path Optimisation (SPO) are two strategies in digital advertising, specifically in the programmatic ecosystem, aimed at improving the efficiency and transparency of the ad supply chain. Both focus on optimising different parts of the ad transaction process, but from different perspectives.

View Article

Mastering Ads.txt File Optimisation with Content Ignites Insight Tool

A guide of wow to improve your Ads.txt file and 5-step overview of understanding our Ads.txt Insights tool

View Article

Google's Privacy Sandbox Delay: What's next?

Google still plans to roll out Sandbox in a gradual manner, and will provide advance notice on how this will work. It looks likely that the ramp up will begin in early 2025.

View Article

Google's Plan to Deprecate Third-Party Cookies Delayed Once Again

Google has decided to postpone the deprecation of third-party cookies beyond the initially planned date of Q4 2024. The search giant has cited regulators as the reason, with the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) needing "sufficient time to review all evidence, including results from industry tests."

View Article

The Importance of Checking your Cookies

An estimated 98% of publishers could not be meeting the necessary level of compliance. Trackers are being deployed before user consent, or after a user has rejected them or the trackers are not being undisclosed at all.

View Article

Impressed? Signup or reach out for your free healthcheck

We only need your email and domain to complete each healthcheck

Preferences

Privacy is important to us, so you have the option of disabling certain types of storage that may not be necessary for the basic functioning of the website. Blocking categories may impact your experience on the website. More information

Accept all cookies

These items are required to enable basic website functionality.

Always active

These items are used to deliver advertising that is more relevant to you and your interests.

These items allow the website to remember choices you make (such as your user name, language, or the region you are in) and provide enhanced, more personal features.

These items help the website operator understand how its website performs, how visitors interact with the site, and whether there may be technical issues.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.